Restarting of troubled San Onofre nuclear plant planned

A plan to restart the shuttered San Onofre Nuclear
Generating Station in northern San Diego County has been submitted to the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission for approval, the plant's operator announced
Thursday.

The plan, which cites no specific restart date, calls for one of two
units at the facility to be restarted at 70 percent power for a five-month
trial period, according to Southern California Edison, which runs the plant and
co-owns it with San Diego Gas & Electric and the city of Riverside.

The commission, which must sign off on the restart plan, is expected to
spend months reviewing it.

Critics expected to lobby against the plan's approval include Friends of
the Earth. The environmental group released a statement this morning, calling
Edison's restart plan “a reckless gamble that flies in the face of the
utility's claim that it puts safety ahead of profits.”

The units — called Unit 2 and Unit 3 — were each shut down in January.
Unit 2 was shut down for planned maintenance, while Unit 3 was abruptly taken
offline after a leak was detected in one of its steam generator tubes.

Edison is proposing to restart Unit 2 while Unit 3 remains offline for
further inspection, analysis and testing.

“Safety is our top priority, and after conducting more than 170,000
inspections to understand and prevent the problem, and confirming the
corrective actions we have taken to solve the problem with the top experts from
around the world, we have concluded that Unit 2 at San Onofre can be operated
safety and within industry norms,” Southern California Edison President Ron
Litzinger said in a statement.

“When implemented, this plan will get San Onofre Unit 2 back to
providing reliable and clean energy to Southern Californians.”

The leak in Unit 3 was caused by tube-to-tube wear due to a phenomenon
called fluid elastic instability, Edison reported. It said a combination of
high-steam velocity and low-moisture conditions in specific locations of tube
bundles and ineffective tube support systems in the same bundle locations
causes the phenomenon and subsequent wear, leading to leaks.

Unit 2 was also susceptible to the same vibration-causing environment
but to a lesser degree than Unit 3, officials said, noting Unit 2 can be safely
restarted at 70 percent power without triggering fluid elastic instability.
Some critics argued against the assertion, saying the designs of the units are
essentially the same.

Edison officials said if the restart plan is approved, they would
operate Unit 2 for five months and then shut it down to inspect it for leaks.

The plan also envisions Edison installing early warning monitors on the
Unit that can detect extremely small leaks faster, and plant employees
receiving additional training on how to respond to a leak.

Categories: KUSI